User:Terry Amburgey
|
[[User:{{{Terry Amburgey}}}|{{{Terry Amburgey}}}]]'s Character Portal |
GM Style
Declining at Meet
It seems that there are frequently more players applying for slots in a run than there are slots. If someone applies, is accepted, and then turns down the job they have denied someone else the chance to play and leaves the other players short-handed. I don't like that.
Sabotage a Job
A player accepting a job and attempting to sabotage it is fine with me. There will certainly be consequences from other players but that's in the hands of the other players. As for NPCs they will react in accordance with their threat & professional level. For lower threat levels the loss of rewards and reputation are the only response.
Seriousness Level
Shadowrun is a serious universe and I like to play around that. Lighthearted moment would be a thing but most of the thing that I like to run involved professional and or pretty bad people that actually do bad thing. So I guess that the runner will become the main source of “non-serious” moment and I’m totally fine with that !
Fair warning grim stuff could happen on the run and I’ll usually mention the stuff that could happen on the run or as a consequence of the run.
Consequences and Failure
The bigger they are, the harder they fall, Who dares wins. Those kind of motto are a pretty good clue about how I play around consequences and failures. I will be more leniant when a well prepared action fail, than a daring one. Lack of common sense will be punished like everywhere but as much as I will punish a failed daring action, the good consequences will be equal.